Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Offshore drilling and deep-sea mining protections→At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 9, 2026.
Public comments (6)
UCSC coastal science student presented research showing deep-sea minerals offshore California aren't realistic mining targets and impacts could be irreversible; strongly supported the ordinance.
City Council — June 9, 2026 · 2:13:31 →Save Our Shores executive director urged approval, saying a yes vote would catalyze similar protections in coastal cities statewide.
City Council — June 9, 2026 · 2:15:41 →Marine scientist called the new ordinance far more legally robust than the 1980s version and framed it as a democratic local response to federal threats.
City Council — June 9, 2026 · 2:17:50 →Spoke for Santa Cruz Climate Action Network in support, citing environmental, economic, and climate risks.
City Council — June 9, 2026 · 2:20:29 →Save the Waves and World Surfing Reserve representative cited $194.7 million in annual surf-related economic value and endorsed the ordinance.
City Council — June 9, 2026 · 2:21:09 →Save Our Shores steward and plover guardian focused on youth stewardship programs and the duty to protect the coast for future generations.
City Council — June 9, 2026 · 2:22:33 →