O
Santa Cruz
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Flock ALPR termination

Santa Cruz

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (21)Opposed (2)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
24
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jan 13, 2026.

Public comments (24)

SupportiveUnidentified ResidentJan 13, 2026

Urged immediate termination and no replacement vendor, saying the community is counting on local government for protection.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 52:42 →
SupportiveSean DoughertyJan 13, 2026

An Apple security engineer said Flock cameras violate hardware security best practices and urged no replacement ALPR system.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 54:03 →
SupportiveMeiJan 13, 2026

Said Flock uses low-paid Filipino AI workers and urged contract cancellation and support for the Philippine Human Rights Act.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:01:35 →
SupportivePeter GelblumJan 13, 2026

ACLU attorney thanked the three councilmembers for the motion and urged immediate camera deactivation after the vote.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:04:00 →
SupportiveJill CliftonJan 13, 2026

Representing Get the Flock Out, cited data misuse cases, security failures, and cities nationwide rejecting Flock.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:09:12 →
OpposedSergeant J. TrogJan 13, 2026

Police Officers Association president asked the council to keep Flock, citing stolen vehicle recoveries and investigative value.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:04:08 →
SupportiveLaura ChathamJan 13, 2026

Cited an exposed ArcGIS API key and urged taking down all cameras.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:16:14 →
SupportiveAnnaJan 13, 2026

An Uber driver said surveillance concerns might drive her out of the essential service she provides.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:19:18 →
SupportiveAndrew DavisJan 13, 2026

Noted crime is at a thirty-year low and said mass surveillance isn't a tool police need.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:21:34 →
SupportiveJoe ThompsonJan 13, 2026

Thanked the three sponsoring councilmembers and urged the full council to end the contract.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:23:25 →
SupportiveMichael LeavyJan 13, 2026

A 46-year resident said surveillance chills democracy and urged no replacement system.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:24:03 →
SupportiveMusaJan 13, 2026

CAIR representative said ALPRs harm immigrant communities and enable ICE data pipelines.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:26:16 →
SupportiveGeorge CadmanJan 13, 2026

Cited ICE data-sharing concerns and weak data protection but said he's sympathetic to police.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:27:52 →
SupportiveGreg BengstonJan 13, 2026

Said the technology isn't mature or secure enough and thanked Santa Cruz police officers.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:31:00 →
SupportiveBrett GarrettJan 13, 2026

Cited Fourth Amendment lawsuit risk and the Governor's veto of SB 274, urging city control of any data collected.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:33:36 →
SupportiveKatherine HedgesJan 13, 2026

With Showing Up for Racial Justice, urged no ALPR at all given inevitable data breaches.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:37:30 →
SupportiveNyankoJan 13, 2026

As a technologist, urged physical camera removal, not just contract cancellation.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:40:06 →
SupportiveLinda MarinJan 13, 2026

Invoked the Anne Frank parallel and asked what the council will do in 2026.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:41:56 →
SupportiveTanya Harmony RidinoJan 13, 2026

A 25-year attorney working with immigrant families said she fears the corporations and federal government behind the cameras, not local police.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:48:00 →
SupportiveChristine KelseyJan 13, 2026

Urged advocates to take the fight to the Watsonville council and questioned Home Depot's private Flock cameras.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:50:43 →
SupportiveGretchen ReyesJan 13, 2026

Supports local police but said the cameras conflict with the city's sanctuary values.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:53:51 →
SupportiveBatya KaganJan 13, 2026

Raised stalking and domestic violence risks from location tracking of vulnerable people.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:57:30 →
OpposedBrad SnyderJan 13, 2026

Said he watched the council approve the cameras and called systematic surveillance a poor idea.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 40:40 →
ConcernedRachel O'MalleyJan 13, 2026

Compared camera locations to the city's disbanded predictive policing model and urged equity checks in any future system.

City Council — January 13, 2026 · 2:05:06 →