Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 24
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jan 13, 2026.
Public comments (24)
Urged immediate termination and no replacement vendor, saying the community is counting on local government for protection.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 52:42 →An Apple security engineer said Flock cameras violate hardware security best practices and urged no replacement ALPR system.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 54:03 →Said Flock uses low-paid Filipino AI workers and urged contract cancellation and support for the Philippine Human Rights Act.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:01:35 →ACLU attorney thanked the three councilmembers for the motion and urged immediate camera deactivation after the vote.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:04:00 →Representing Get the Flock Out, cited data misuse cases, security failures, and cities nationwide rejecting Flock.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:09:12 →Police Officers Association president asked the council to keep Flock, citing stolen vehicle recoveries and investigative value.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:04:08 →Cited an exposed ArcGIS API key and urged taking down all cameras.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:16:14 →An Uber driver said surveillance concerns might drive her out of the essential service she provides.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:19:18 →Noted crime is at a thirty-year low and said mass surveillance isn't a tool police need.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:21:34 →Thanked the three sponsoring councilmembers and urged the full council to end the contract.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:23:25 →A 46-year resident said surveillance chills democracy and urged no replacement system.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:24:03 →CAIR representative said ALPRs harm immigrant communities and enable ICE data pipelines.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:26:16 →Cited ICE data-sharing concerns and weak data protection but said he's sympathetic to police.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:27:52 →Said the technology isn't mature or secure enough and thanked Santa Cruz police officers.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:31:00 →Cited Fourth Amendment lawsuit risk and the Governor's veto of SB 274, urging city control of any data collected.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:33:36 →With Showing Up for Racial Justice, urged no ALPR at all given inevitable data breaches.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:37:30 →As a technologist, urged physical camera removal, not just contract cancellation.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:40:06 →Invoked the Anne Frank parallel and asked what the council will do in 2026.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:41:56 →A 25-year attorney working with immigrant families said she fears the corporations and federal government behind the cameras, not local police.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:48:00 →Urged advocates to take the fight to the Watsonville council and questioned Home Depot's private Flock cameras.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:50:43 →Supports local police but said the cameras conflict with the city's sanctuary values.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:53:51 →Raised stalking and domestic violence risks from location tracking of vulnerable people.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 1:57:30 →Said he watched the council approve the cameras and called systematic surveillance a poor idea.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 40:40 →Compared camera locations to the city's disbanded predictive policing model and urged equity checks in any future system.
City Council — January 13, 2026 · 2:05:06 →