O
Santa Cruz
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

900 High Street

Santa Cruz

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (9)

At a glance

Public comments
11
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Aug 11, 2026.

Public comments (11)

SupportiveDavid PatteeAug 11, 2026

Pastor of Peace United Church of Christ urged approval, calling Peace Village part of the church's vision for diverse, affordable housing.

City Council — August 11, 2026 · 3:01:15 →
SupportiveJohn HallAug 11, 2026

Church member urged approval without further conditions, noting the congregation supports the design and cohousing model.

City Council — August 11, 2026 · 3:02:46 →
OpposedUnidentified ResidentAug 11, 2026

Asked the council to deny the modifications and hold the project to the 2024-approved 40-unit design, citing views, scale, affordability mix, and traffic.

City Council — August 11, 2026 · 3:07:02 →
OpposedClayton MarkelAug 11, 2026

Opposed the project citing traffic, parking, no nearby stores or transit, and stormwater runoff issues.

City Council — August 11, 2026 · 3:09:40 →
OpposedDeb de la Luz deBruynAug 11, 2026

Opposed the project, calling the hilltop site a food desert with poor walkability and the building an eyesore; also criticized vinyl windows.

City Council — August 11, 2026 · 3:13:03 →
OpposedBradly SnyderAug 11, 2026

Opposed increased density near campus, citing student housing strain and socioeconomic effects on the neighborhood.

City Council — August 11, 2026 · 3:15:00 →
OpposedAndrew MerriamAug 11, 2026

Argued the modification is effectively a new project and that the prior permit lapsed after 24 months without being exercised.

City Council — August 11, 2026 · 3:17:59 →
OpposedJudi GrunstraAug 11, 2026

Cited the film Blue Vinyl on toxic byproducts of vinyl and urged rejecting vinyl windows given the city's climate action plan.

City Council — August 11, 2026 · 3:21:30 →
OpposedRon GoodmanAug 11, 2026

Warned the karst terrain project could permanently damage downstream springs, citing damage already documented below the UCSC project; urged a hydrogeological study.

City Council — August 11, 2026 · 3:26:20 →
OpposedAndrea TolaioAug 11, 2026

Asked for financial information on the project's ROI and criticized the co-living bedroom approach as not addressing family affordable housing; urged denial.

City Council — August 11, 2026 · 3:29:30 →
OpposedDeborah ElstonAug 11, 2026

Said the process seems backwards — drilling and seismic data should be updated before approval, noting the recently awakened fault line near the neighborhood.

City Council — August 11, 2026 · 3:31:28 →